Castle
Episode 11: Under the
Influence
By: Carlos Uribe
Castle
is a show about a mystery writer who helps his lover solve crimes.
Spoilers
Ahoy!
I
wonder if Castle realizes that it sends out the wrong message at
times. In the fourth season premiere, the characters had decided to
keep Montgomery's corruption a secret because it might ruin his good
reputation while praising his good character. He might have redeemed
himself at the end but the show was acting like his previous crimes
didn't actually tarnish the man. This didn't bother me because the
episode was too busy with other elements that it didn't really jump
out at me. The show has had moments where the characters have been
willing to bend the law in order to solve cases. These breaks don't
bother me that much because they're generally very small: characters
going into places because they pretended to have heard something. One
of the largest causes of conflict between our cops is when Ryan told
Gates that Esposito and Beckett were illegally pursuing a man
involved in Beckett's mom's case. Esposito is angry at Ryan for this
but the show quickly buries the hatchet before viewers realize what
that hatchet stands for. Whether one agrees with him or not, Ryan was
completely in the right. What Esposito and Beckett were doing was
breaking the rules. They were willing to break the law in order to
solve a case. That wasn't the last time that happened as when Castle
broke himself out of jail in order to prove his innocence. In other
words, this show has gained a history where the writers seem to
actually romanticize the characters breaking laws. Montgomery was
corrupt? That's okay, he was a stand-up guy! Castle broke out of
jail? It's okay! It's almost as if the show thinks that setting up
the law as an obstacle to our characters can only be overcome if they
break it and that's okay. This isn't unique to this show as the
Mentalist did something similar in it's latest episode but it at least created a situation to justify it.
So
why do I bring this up? It's because Esposito goes to a bad guy and
basically threatens to kill him in cold blood. It's supposed to be a
big moment where the audience gets to see Javier act all tough and
doing what is necessary to protect kids from crime. It's also a
moment where Javier broke a law and admitted that he plans to break
more of them. Is this supposed to be fine? The series seems to think
that going into this dark place is perfectly acceptable for the
character. It's true that this decision doesn't come out of nowhere
for Esposito but it's still something that needs to be brought up.
This is a character who is willing to literally threaten a guy that
he's going to abuse the law in order to finish him off. Is this good
police work? Is this upholding the law that Esposito promised? If so,
then what separates him from a corrupt cop? They are both breaking
the law. The motives might be different but it's not like the legal
system has different groups of punishment based on why a person broke
the law. It wouldn't surprise me if there's a future episode where
Esposito decides to accept taking bribes because he clearly doesn't
think that the law applies to him. That scene stands out in an
otherwise forgettable episode. I might not have even dwelled on it if
the weekly case had been more interesting or if I cared about that
kid that Esposito was trying to connect with. What stood out for this
episode is that Esposito doesn't really seem to care when he breaks
the law. Which makes it all the more ironic when he tries to convince
a kid that breaking the law isn't a good career choice. Esposito
might be a cop but he's not really a very good one. If the point was that he's not supposed to be then that is fine but the series acts as if he is.
What
else is there to say about this episode? The weekly case was
completely and utterly boring. It started out promising enough in the
cold open but it quickly became dull and lifeless. A lot of the spark
that the previous episode contained was gone this week. The suspects
were boring, the scenes were a chore to get through, and the comedy
was toned down. I guess it's because this was supposed to be a
serious episode where Esposito bonds with a young kid. Which would
have been fine except the kid was basically a walking cliché and the
actor they picked didn't have the charisma to pull of his sarcastic
remarks. When the kid is such an important part of the episode, then
casting is more important than usual.
Under
the Influence isn't a very good episode of Castle. The weekly case
was forgettable and it only serves to bring to attention on how
crooked Esposito (and the other characters) really is. I'm certain
that wasn't the intent of the writers. If this episode proves
anything, it's that concentrating on anyone not named “Castle” or
“Beckett” is a really bad idea simply because Esposito isn't a
strong enough character to build an episode around.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be respectful of people's opinions. Remember these reviews are MY opinion and you may disagree with them. These are just TV shows.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.