Episode 19: And the
Band Played On
By: Carlos Uribe
Harry's
Law is a show about a lawyer Harry and her shoe store/law firm.
Spoiler
Alert!
Who
did Nancy Grace attack this week? An entire marching band. When an
annual hazing ritual ends up killing the victim, they all get sued
for murder. That is 37 kids who are getting charged for killing one
person, and a lot of them may not even have actually contributed to
his death. It was an accidental death and it had turned the friendly
initiation into a moment of sadness. Nancy Grace goes on to question
the humanity of the members this marching band, while missing the
point. This was a ritual that was tradition and they thought it was
relatively harmless. There was no way the marching band could have
known that the kid had a collary issue and that this would cause the
kid to suffer a heart attack. She misses the entire point that it's
an accident, simply because it wouldn't bring the ratings that she so
desperately wants. One of the marching band members hires Phoebe, who
brings Harry's law firm to aid her out. When Harry ends up making the
argument in front of the judge, it makes me wonder why that kid kept
Phoebe on retainer.
Harry
decides that the best way to resolve this case is to get rid of the
felony murder rule in this case. The felony murder rule is what
enables the district attorney to charge every band member for the
same crime due to their indirect actions. If a murder occurs due to
an action, even if the death was accidental, then the rule applies.
This is a rule that's meant to help place robbers who accidentally or
purposefully killed their victims, but it's not meant for a hazing
ritual gone wrong. If the rule doesn't qualify to the case, then that
means that only the people that the district attorney can directly
state they caused the heart attack be charged with murder. This means
that not every band member is off, but it's heavily implied that
Harry's client is. He had his eyes shut and he may not have even
touched the victim so there would be no reason to charge him. It's
interesting that the show takes the stance that this rule should be
abolished, but I'm not entirely sure I completely understand why the
rule needs to be completely repealed. I am interested enough to learn
more about it, so the show has piqued my interest. That's good.
There's
another case this week, and it's a civil one. A married man accuses a
woman that he slept with of rape. He claims that while the passion
leading to the sex was consensual, the actual intercourse was not. He
also accuses the woman of having drugged him. He is traumatized by
the event, but the actor didn't do that good of a job since I mostly
didn't see it. He doesn't want any money and by suing, he is
admitting to the public record that he had an unwilling affair so the
show concludes that he must have been raped. The motive of accusing
rape to excuse his cheating never came up. He was indeed drugged and
he ends up getting an apology from the woman. That's all that he
wanted as he doesn't seek to pursue charges.
Harry's
Law had a good episode this week. It had an interesting main case,
but I didn't really find myself getting into the other case. It's
probably because I didn't really connect with the victim for some
reason. It's also hard for me to buy that he was that traumatized due
to some rather poor acting. The other elements of the show were good
enough to keep the show entertaining. I do wonder if this
fictionalized Nancy Grace is going to accidentally kill someone,
which will lead her to try and hire Harry as a lawyer. That would be
entertaining.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be respectful of people's opinions. Remember these reviews are MY opinion and you may disagree with them. These are just TV shows.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.