Sinbad
Episode 1: Pilot
By: Carlos Uribe
Sinbad
is a British television series about the mystical adventures of the
sailor Sinbad.
Spoilers
Ahoy!
There are two kinds of shows: the ones with a serialized plotline
that gets developed every week and the one where there's a different
weekly plot. It's gotten more complicated as the latter has started
to introduce serialized conflicts into it's framework. Sinbad is a
pretty good example of this. The pilot might spend a lot too much
time getting to the basic premise of the show but it sets up an
overreaching narrative while promising weekly adventures. The basic
idea behind the show is that the actions of the thief Sinbad
accidentally leads to the death of his brother. His grandmother isn't
too happy with him so she curses him so that he can only be on land
for a whole day. He's basically been cursed to spend his life
traveling on a ship until he can find redemption. The series has set
up the excuse for the weekly adventures (the curse) while giving his
character a strong motive (redemption). The promised serialized arc
of the show comes from Lord Akbari. Sinbad had accidentally killed
the lord's son at the beginning of the epiosde and Akbari wants
revenge. He wants to kill Sinbad. He's going to be the recurring
antagonist but his quest for revenge is also what's going to provide
a serialized plot. Let's face it: a series could last in perpetuity
of Sinbad searching redemption through his voyages. He would have no
actual chance of finding redemption until the final episode nor would
the adventures actually have to add up to anything. It's true that
Lord Akbari's quest could easily be in perpetuity as well in the
sense that every episode he has a plan that's foiled. There are three
reasons that make me doubt that is the extent the series plans to
take the character: the first is that he has no real plan in this
episode. He gets to easily arrest Sinbad. The second is simply
because he's not stuck in the ocean. He can interact with different
characters that will hopefully allow the series to develop a
serialized narrative over time. The final reason is because a huge
portion of the episode is spent on building things up. This gives the
impression that there's an actual narrative here rather than just an
excuse for episodic adventures. I could be wrong. It's possible
Sinbad is just going to be a show where the protagonist goes on
weekly adventures as he foils Akbari's latest plan.
The pilot for Sinbad is surprisingly patient. It begins by
introducing him and his brother as they run a con game during the
street fights. They steal from an African diplomat and believe that
they are going to have a great day. This serves as our basic
introduction to Sinbad and it's an effective one at setting up his
character archetype. The pilot then moves into the part where Sinbad,
along with his brother, is arrested because the person he had been
fighting was Akhbari's son. He had accidentally killed the son during
the battle. The fates turn against him as Akhbari kills Sinbad's
brother. Sinbad manages to escape prison before it's his turn but his
grandmother curses him to seek redemption by going on weekly voyages.
The pilot basically did two things there: it set up the antagonist
and why he's so bent on taking Sinbad down. It also sets up why
Sinbad is going to be leaving his city and going on adventures. The
next part of the pilot is when he sneaks on board of a ship and it
gets attacked by magical water creatures. He doesn't really do a lot
but he is able to save the principal cast from dying. Everyone else
is not so lucky. This is basically the part of the pilot that shows
how the weekly adventures are going to be: Sinbad is going to be
facing a weekly supernatural creature on his adventures. The final
part of the pilot is basically the last shot as Sinbad is at the
front of the ship with the main characters on board: a chef, another
thief, a warrior, and the daughter of the diplomat. In other words,
there's the ship's crew and the promise of the weekly adventures is
in that shot. That right there is the mission statement of Sinbad.
It's good at setting up the premise as it allows us to know the
protagonist, lets us understand the stakes and different key players,
and giving us a taste of what's to come.
The pilot for Sinbad isn't perfect and it's pretty clear with the
protagonist. Sinbad is a character archetype but he never really
develops beyond that despite all the time we spend with him. He's a
con-man who is willing to do the right thing but he doesn't have much
of a personality beyond this. There's no reason given for why he's
such a thief in the first place and the only sense of edge the
character could have (brother's death) is slightly forgotten by the
end of the episode. The series spends a lot of time developing his
relationship with his brother. It works because it makes his death
have an actual impact but the brother could have also been written
better. He could have been fleshed out as his only personality
trait was that he always followed his brother around. Sinbad has set
up it's premise but the reason we're going to want to watch this show
is because of Sinbad. A character archetype is a way to start setting
up a character but there needs to be work done on top of that so that
he could become a strong character. At the moment, Sinbad is still
just an archetype and he's not complex nor compelling enough to make
for an effective protagonist. I'm sure future episodes should be able
to fix this problem as they have more time to flesh him out but it's
disappointing to see such a two-dimensional character after spending
a whole episode focused around just him. So much so that none of his
crew really have much of a personality. If you're going to sacrifice
most of the time that would be spent developing other characters to
develop just one then at least do it right. Sinbad got a lot right
with it's premise but it didn't go far enough in developing the
titular character. This basically leaves little reason to actually
come back.
The rest of the characters are developed very sparingly. Akhbari has
an excellent actor in Naveen Andrews, who is basically this show's
version of Giancarlo Esposito: outshining everyone with a top-notch
perfomance despite having a two-dimensional character. Akhbari is
basically defined by the grief of losing his son and that's it. The
ship's doctor is Anwar, who just wants to help. That's basically it.
Sinbad is not the only thief on his ship as he caught Rina trying to
steal stuff before the ship disembarked. All we know about her is
that she's a thief. The ship's warrior is Gunnar, who is largely
defined by how tough he looks. The diplomat's daughter, Nala, that
Sinbad had earlier stolen from is also on the ship. She's probably
the only side character to get her own small character arc where she
goes from willing to show mercy on thieves to wanting to punish them.
The only real impression she makes is that she keeps talking about
the power of the vodoo head that Sinbad threw away. There's also the
ship's cook but that's all I know about the character. In other
words: none of them are really developed beyond the basic role
they're playing. I'm sure more time will be spent fleshing them out
as future episodes come but it also means that Sinbad is left on his
own to carry the show. He's simply not a strong enough character to
do that.
Sinbad has an okay pilot. It sets up the premise surprisingly well by
being patient. It doesn't have a perfect plot but it does focus on
the titular character. Sadly, Sinbad himself remains two-dimensional
and he's not that interesting as a consequence. The time spent on him
(and his brother) basically meant that most of the ship's crew remain
undeveloped. It's good that the pilot concentrated on Sinbad but it
also means future episodes are going to have to spend time doing
something a pilot is supposed to do: actually establishing characters
for some of the ship's crew. Overall, Sinbad could be a fun show for
it's one and only season (it's already been canceled) but it's not
one that sets itself to be appointment television.
Other
Notes:
A character notes how science is basically causing magic to weaken
but there's no sign of that when magic comes into play during the
episode. Inconsistent internal rules, people!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be respectful of people's opinions. Remember these reviews are MY opinion and you may disagree with them. These are just TV shows.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.