Body of Proof
Episode 1: Abducted
By: Carlos Uribe
Body
of Proof is a show about an ME that basically acts like a cop because
she breaks the rules and is Dana Delany.
Spoiler
Alert!
Body of Proof was a show that premiered March 29, 2011 on ABC. It was
about a medical examiner that helped the police solve cases. She
didn't just do her job in identifying people but she helped
interrogate and look for clues. This is a show where a medical
examiner will get all the credit and the city morgue has really nice
offices. It's the type of show where the head of the morgue will
actually give out press releases that the media pays attention. I
could be wrong but it's usually the police chief or the District
Attorney that will speak to the press. This isn't a cop show that's
really going for realism as Megan Hunt practically forces herself
into the investigation. The show was successful enough for the first
two seasons but declining ratings convinced the network that it
needed to retool the show. A retool is an often used ploy to try and
save a show but it's rarely successful. This is because it tends to
upset the people already tuning in because they like what they have
been watching and it's rare for the average viewer to give a show a
second chance. They could try and appeal to people who have never
seen the show before but this can be just as difficult. That would
mean having to spend money into marketing and having to convince them
to give this show a shot. If you're a viewer who gave up within
episode or someone whose never seen the show then I'm not sure this
season premiere is for you. In this regard, the purpose of the retool
failed. If you're a fan, I have no idea how happy you'll be with the
changes.
The only episode of Body of Proof was the pilot and that was back
when it first aired. I didn't really remember any of the characters.
What I do remember thinking of the episode was that it was a decent
procedural with a strong lead but nothing beyond that. The weekly
case wasn't that interesting, the side characters were flat, and the
world didn't make a lot of sense. As I said, this is a morgue that
appears to be better funded than the police office. It doesn't make a
lot of sense as I doubt that's the case in reality. Megan Hunt is
basically able to get away with anything no matter how much people
try to control her actions. This is because she's a strong
independent woman whose going to do as she pleases, rules be damned.
The premise of the show hasn't changed in the retool. The question to
me was if the show had been able to build a solid procedural based on
the pilot. This is the only episode I have seen since then so it's
the only point of evidence. The difficult part about a television
show is that it can have weak and strong episodes from one week to
the other that makes it challenging to truly tell the quality of a
show in the long-run. I'm not going to try and state the quality of
the show but rather the episode that's supposed to change things
around to attract viewers that they lost along the way with new ones
and the ones who liked the old show. This is the second impression
that the show is giving out and I'm not convinced to tune in.
A large problem is how high stakes the episode ends with. The weekly
case seems to be normal. There are bodies and they manage to find the
killer. The killer ends up dying but the episode ends with a huge
twist. The killer had been putting in bombs in the bodies and he was
working with someone else. The daughter, Lacey, gets kidnapped at the
end. There are a couple notes I would like to make here. The first is
that this premiere is eerily similar to the Castle episode that aired
the night before in that Castle's daughter had been kidnapped. At the
same time, it was more successful in it's cliff-hanger because there
is a sense of urgency to need to rescue Lacey because her life is in
immediate danger. If I was a fan of the show, I would probably be
hooked. The second note is that the episode made a frustrating
technique of opening with the cliff-hanger before building the entire
episode to the events. This basically means you know there's more to
the weekly case but in-media rest beginnings should not refer to the
end but the middle. It makes for frustrating viewing because that's
all you're waiting for. It might be good to hook the viewer but it
also distracted me throughout the episode-which is why I wasn't
hooked. The weekly case is basically a pretty good entertaining one
but it suffered by that beginning. I understand wanting to get the
viewer hooked from the first scene but the case was strong enough on
it's own to do that. It wasn't just the distraction of the very
beginning but that the high stakes didn't allow me to truly get into
the world.
The problem is I'm not sure the world is one I want to get into. It's
not because it's ridiculous but because it didn't try to really catch
me up. It gave me some basic info but that's it. The episode picks up
three months after the finale. The previous male lead, Peter, was
killed in a stabbing. Why? You'd have to ask someone who saw the
episode. Two other characters were written out (one joined the FBI
and the other resigned to take care of a baby) but I have no idea who
they are. The show doesn't try to really introduce me to Megan Hunt.
It expects that I'm already familiar with her. It makes the same
mistake with her two lab assistants. There's the chubby guy who I
liked due to his sense of humor and the skinny one who made no
impression. That I don't even know they're names is a sign that the
show didn't even try to introduce them to me. What's the point of the
retool if not to attract new viewers or ones who caught it a long
time ago? Where's all the work at catching me up to what I need to
know. There's also a boss who is apparently running for political
office. I'm not sure why I care when I don't know her. Also, why did
she seem to give the cops instructions? It's all very confusing
because the only character to really get any attention was Megan. I
will commend the show with Lacey. I might not know who she is but the
actress portraying her made a great impression-and she has great
screen chemistry with Dana Delaney.
What about the two new cop characters? The new lead is Tommy
Sullivan. I like the actor portraying him, which is part of the
reason I checked out the retool. Mark Valley did a good job in
Fringe, Human Target, and Harry's Law. Tommy's character is largely
defined on how he used to have a thing with Megan back in the day.
He's not a fully-formed character. His partner, Adam, is even more
undeveloped as he only keeps on questioning Tommy about his old
relationship status. The closest he had to a personality was when he
asked if they got to ask female patients to lift up their shirts to
check for incisions. The actor playing him did a good job but
there's only so much you can do when you have a flat character.
Overall, I didn't connect with any of the old characters or the new
ones. This means there's no reason for me to come back.
Abducted is the first episode in a retool and the second chance this
show had impressing me. It decided that it would make no attempt to
actually win me over as this was an episode that was definably
written for the fans. I have no idea if they will love it or not but
the show failed to win me over. It's a good episode and this is a
good procedural-this is a show I could see myself watching in
syndication but simply not live.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be respectful of people's opinions. Remember these reviews are MY opinion and you may disagree with them. These are just TV shows.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.