The Good Wife
Episode 13: The Seven
Day Rule
By: Carlos Uribe
The
Good Wife is a show about Alicia Florrick and her career and
scandalous personal life.
Spoilers
Ahoy!
The
weekly case of the episode involved the return of Neil Gross. Neil is
the inventor of that search engine and he's getting married. He's
getting a prenuptial with his fiance and that's where our characters
come in. Neil's fiancee hires David Lee to look over the prenup to
ensure it was in her best interest. While she may not have cared that
much about the money, her father had convinced her to seek a second
opinion because she was being represented by Neil's law firm when the
prenup was drawn up. In what should come as no surprise, it's a
prenup that completely favors Neil. David and Cary are able to
resolve this by manipulating their client and Neil's lawyers in order
to get the best deal possible. It's actually pretty genius how they
won. The whole bankruptcy plot is basically about how the firm
conducts business in a cynical and dirty fashion. They might not
break the law but they'll subvert it for their benefit. They might
not be a decent law firm but they do get the job done for their
clients. They managed to get the best deal for their client was
accomplished in a questionably ethical way. That the show was able to
show us Clarke's problems with how the firm handles it business in an
episode that relied so heavily on it was a smart move. That the show
didn't feel the need to call attention to this is a sign that this
show might have stumbled with some of the plots but that it's just as
smart as ever. The weekly case managed to serve as a subtle reminder
that Clarke's complaints about the law firm are completely
legitimate. That's just smart plotting-and it was also a fun weekly
case on it's own but it was best used as a sub-plot.
The
bankruptcy plot is just as fun as the weekly case. The two name
partners of the firm have to go in front of a judge to get a five
month extension to finish paying off the debt. They have evidence
that they'll be able to meet this deadline. We don't actually see any
documents but I'd like to note that they paid have the debt in five
months is pretty convincing evidence to a layman like me. I guess
that's why I'm not an accountant or bankruptcy judge. This reasonable
request is being objected to by Clarke and their creditor, Canning.
The two try to claim that the firm has been using client money to pay
off the debt. This failed so they shifted tactics. They brought up
that all of the four-year associates have been given a chance to
become equity partners. This acts as a small plot twist that might or
might not have caught you off-guard. I kind of saw it coming but I
didn't realize the extent of it. The way the show laid it out was
smart. It began with Alicia finding out that they wanted to promote
her to a partner. This would make sense. She's not only the
protagonist who barely loses any cases but she's married to a
prominent politician. It would be good press just to have her as a
partner. It's believable that she would be asked to become a partner
within four years especially because television characters tend to
advance through their careers at an advanced pace. It helps that they
think she can pay the absurd capital investment of $600,000. The high
amount of cash is a huge investment into the firm but it's also the
first sign that the show gives out that she was only offered the
promotion so they can use the money into showing further progress
into the debt. This is only confirmed when Cary reveals he was also
offered the promotion but it's not until we learn that two other
associates got the promotion that we realize the extent of this
scheme. A scheme that doesn't help Canning because Clarke is a
straight arrow who admits that Canning basically offered him a job in
exchange for his assistance. Clarke might not like how Lockhart &
Gardner does it's business but he chooses to follow a straight line.
This
all leads to the episode's conclusion where Alicia is pouting in her
office because she realized she wasn't getting promoted by her own
merit. Diane comes in with the advice to suck it up and accept it.
When Diane got promoted to partner it was because Stern was involved
in a sexual harassment suit. He needed a female partner to make him
look good. She took the job despite the reason she was offered it and
used it to her advantage. It's a cynical viewpoint but it's one that
does carry some hope with it. That advice would have worked on any
old regular day but Diane wanted Alicia to appear like she was
invested in the firm. Diane basically threatened to rescind the offer
if Alicia didn't go out there with a big smile. That's exactly what
Alicia did but with the public smile that has no real meaning to it.
It's a blow to Diane but it manages to present some interesting
ideas. Diane's advice to Alicia suggests that their mentor/mentee
relationship is going on another level but the threat it carried
might cause problems between the two. That Alicia found out the real
reason she was getting promoted might have also shook her loyalty
with the firm. There's many places the show can take this and they're
all just as compelling as the other. It might not have been the
world's most exciting cliff-hanger but it was effective in just how
complicated it really was.
Law
firm drama and weekly cases are good but there's an election sub-plot
as well. It basically deals with the religious denomination of the
characters. Maddie turns out to be an atheist which would normally be
a good thing because the voters don't like people who are certain
there is no God. It's a viable attack except Alicia makes the
situation complicated when she admits that she's also an atheist.
It's a decent way to explore the religious component of any
politician but it didn't really make for compelling drama or great
comic relief. It was good in that it added pressure to Alicia but it
seemed to distract from what was actually interesting. The political
sub-plot took a lot out of the narrative momentum simply because it
didn't really felt essential. That this plot lacks tension is
probably the biggest indicator of what's wrong with it. We need to
feel like Peter might actually lose and that this actually matters.
I'm hoping that Alicia joining as an equity partner will somehow make
the governor's race relevant by tying the stakes of the election
results to their economic wellbeing. I have no idea but the stakes of
the election simply aren't working on their own. That might be the
reason that what worked so well in the second season has been so
disappointing in this one-there feels like there's nothing really at
stake here.
The
Seven Day Rule is a pretty great episode of the Good Wife. The weekly
case and what's happening with the bankruptcy perfectly compliment
each other. The ending of the episode helps to give the show multiple
options of where to go from now. This manages to show that the series
still has it. The only weakpoint is that while the election sub-plot
had some moments, it still hasn't gotten to be interesting. This only
goes to highlight that the season still has problems that need to be
fixed and soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be respectful of people's opinions. Remember these reviews are MY opinion and you may disagree with them. These are just TV shows.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.